Michael B. Flinn, Ph.D. is this week’s #RacerScholar

flinnOur #RacerScholar this week is Professor Michael B. Flinn in the Department of Biology. He contributed to the article, “Baseflow physical characteristics differ at multiple spatial scales in stream networks across diverse biomes,” which appeared in volume 31, issue 1 of Landscape Ecology.

Abstract

Context
Spatial scaling of ecological processes is facilitated by quantifying underlying habitat attributes. Physical and ecological patterns are often measured at disparate spatial scales limiting our ability to quantify ecological processes at broader spatial scales using physical attributes.

Objective
We characterized variation of physical stream attributes during periods of high biological activity (i.e., baseflow) to match physical and ecological measurements and to identify the spatial scales exhibiting and predicting heterogeneity.

Methods
We measured canopy cover, wetted width, water depth, and sediment size along transects of 1st-5th order reaches in five stream networks located in biomes from tropical forest to arctic tundra. We used hierarchical analysis of variance with three nested scales (watersheds, stream orders, reaches) to identify scales exhibiting significant heterogeneity in attributes and regression analyses to characterize gradients within and across stream networks.

Results
Heterogeneity was evident at one or multiple spatial scales: canopy cover and water depth varied significantly at all three spatial scales while wetted width varied at two scales (stream order and reach) and sediment size remained largely unexplained. Similarly, prediction by drainage area depended on the attribute considered: depending on the watershed, increases in wetted width and water depth with drainage area were best fit with a linear, logarithmic, or power function. Variation in sediment size was independent of drainage area.

Conclusions
The scaling of ecologically relevant baseflow physical characteristics will require study beyond the traditional bankfull geomorphology since predictions of baseflow physical attributes by drainage area were not always best explained by geomorphic power laws.

1Baseflow physical characteristics differ at multiple spatial scales in stream networks across diverse biomes
By Janine Rüegg , Walter K. Dodds, Melinda D. Daniels, Ken R. Sheehan, Christina L. Baker, William B. Bowden, Kaitlin J. Farrell, Michael B. Flinn, Tamara K. Harms, Jeremy B. Jones, Lauren E. Koenig, John S. Kominoski, William H. McDowell, Samuel P. Parker, Amy D. Rosemond, Matt T. Trentman, Matt Whiles, Wilfred M. Wollheim
Landscape Ecology : JAN 2016, vol. 31(1), pgs. 119-136
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0289-y

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s